On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12/31/2013 03:29 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: > > Dear Francesco and Bas, I was trying to read all possible > > information (bug reports, debian/changelog, mailing list) about the > > libgdal1h issue and transition, but still, it is not clear for me > > what the current state is and what it needs to be done to complete > > this task. > > > > Please, could you summarize current situation ? Is it possible > > that GDAL 10 packaging will be fully completed soon enough to get > > to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS in best shape ? > > Hi Ivan, > > The current situation with GDAL in Debian is that 1.10.1+dfsg-2 is in > unstable: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdal.html > > And the transition is almost complete, as can be seen in the > transition tracker: > > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal.html > > The remaining packages are waiting for the new openscenegraph 3.2.1 > package in unstable before they can be rebuild: > > http://bugs.debian.org/720816 > > The osmium package is not maintained by the Debian GIS team and may > need an NMU to rebuild with the new GDAL. > > As Johan van de Wauw mentioned, the GDAL 1.10.1+dfsg-2 package has > been synced from Debian into Ubuntu. > > An outstanding issue with the GDAL 1.10.1 package in Debian is that we > still need to update the symbols files. > > The README.source states that this process involved "a bit of vi/sed > magics", which I didn't use but a quick and dirty Perl script. > > So I've asked Francesco to review my changes first. They live in my > person git clone for the moment: > > > http://git.linuxminded.nl/?p=pkg-grass/gdal;a=commitdiff;h=47717db65c97c8d0b3e293976aa3963fc406318d > > I should probably rerun the script on the 1.10.1+dfsg-2 packages to > see if the changes remained stable between -1 and -2. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > Sebastiaan, thanks a lot for clarification and your work. Ivan
