On 02/22/2014 04:22 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 02/22/2014 12:10 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 02/21/2014 11:29 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:36:17PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> QGIS is the only reverse dependency of osgEarth currently. Since qgis >>>> 2.0.1-2 was only accepted into unstable yesterday, uploading osgEarth >>>> 2.5 right now seems a bit early. >>> >>> Did you consider experimental for uploading? That would allow at >>> least find major building issues sooner than later. >> >> Uploading at least osgearth to experimental is probably a good idea just >> to be sure it builds on all other architectures too (except hurd-i386 >> where its build dependencies are unsatisfied because openscenegraph FTBFS). > > Uploading to experimental at least once is also good to collect the > symbols for the other architectures. So I've updated the package for > experimental using a more appropriate package version, and requested > sponsorship (#739732).
The new build dependency on libv8-dev prevents osgEarth 2.5 from being built on hurd-i386, mips, powerpc, s390x & sparc because libv8-3.14 explicitly excludes them from its architecture list. Because osgEarth 2.4 was built on all architectures except hurd-i386, the experimental builds of QGIS 2.2 are now inconsistent. I've added a versioned build dependency on at least osgearth-dev 2.5.0 to tie the fate of QGIS 2.2 to osgEarth 2.5 and its build dependencies. If the qgis builds on the remaining ports succeed, I think we should upload osgearth 2.5.0+dfsg-1 and qgis 2.2.0-1 to unstable. Kind Regards, Bas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
