Hi Paolo, Thanks for trying the new QGIS packages.
On 03/01/2014 07:29 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Hi all. > Are the experimental packages meant to be installable? They are definitely meant to be installable. > I'm getting a conflict: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libqgispython2.2.0 : Depends: libqgis-core2.2.0 (>= 2.2.0) but > 2.2.0-0~exp1 is to be installed. > libqgis-analysis2.2.0 : Depends: libqgis-core2.2.0 (>= 2.2.0) but > 2.2.0-0~exp1 is to be installed. > libqgis-gui2.2.0 : Depends: libqgis-core2.2.0 (>= 2.2.0) but > 2.2.0-0~exp1 is to be installed. > libqgisgrass2.2.0 : Depends: libqgis-core2.2.0 (>= 2.2.0) but > 2.2.0-0~exp1 is to be installed. Choosing -0 for the experimental revision doesn't seem like such a good idea now. 2.2.0 is considered newer than 2.2.0-0~exp1 causing the versioned dependency not to be satisfied by -0~exp1. > As soon as they are installable, I'll do extensive testing. > Thanks. I've fixed the version number in git, and am preparing a new build for experimental. qgis 2.0.1-2 need a few more days to migrate to testing, soon after that I'd like to upload 2.2.0-1 to unstable. Kind Regards, Bas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
