On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:34:27PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:04:20PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> AFAIK, we need to get Markus Wanners work on 1.8.16 from January into > >> git, as OSSIM still lives in Subversion at the moment. And we can merge > >> these recent changes on top of that. > >> > >> Markus said his work on OSSIM was one-time effort only because it was > >> blocking the OSG transition. So I guess I will volunteer to migrate > >> OSSIM from SVN to Git and merge the UbuntuGIS changes, unless somebody > >> beats me to it. > >> > > > > This is not correct. An ossim version in git is already present and also > > partially updated since 2012. It was there and never updated because > > of a few issues at the time with the package. Now I'm working on that. > > It seems I misremember the state of OSSIM, I stand corrected. > > Good stuff that it's in git already, and that you're working on it. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > >
Ok, as expected, the PPA package is not specifically in so good shape and at the same time I just discovered a series of issues to be considered in rdepends before proceed: * geotiff is missing .cmake modules * ITK4 -dev package is distributing .cmake modules in the wrong path (reporting as bug in a few) * geos is missing .cmake support or so and probably other issues as well. I wonder why those issues are not evident in the Ubuntu flavor, or how are those pkgs built finally? -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
