Rashad wrote: >Copy paste from geos page[1]: >"" >The recommended low-level interface to the GEOS library is the simplified C wrapper interface. This will ensure stability of the API and the ABI of the library during performance improvements that will likely change classes definitions. >If you prefer troubles you can use the C++ interface >"" >This is not that comfortable in the main page of documentation and keep people away. I really dont understand what they mean by "troubles". Is it incorrectly spelled some how? ( no offense. just a joke) > > >[1] http://geos.refractions.net/ro/doxygen_docs/html/index.html
> If the C++ interface is deprecated by Geos that make it > intolerable for any existing libraries using that part > and I think ossim will also be replacing geos like all others. I believe the idea is that the C one is stable, and C++ programs can still link in to that one. IIRC the exact same migration away from GDAL's C++ API happened a year or three ago, and aside from the time it took to convince people to change. it really wasn't a big deal and didn't require massive rewrites. regards, Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
