On 08/08/2014 12:52 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 08/08/2014 08:10 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 12:51:58AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> >>> I've addressed some of the lintian issues, but I'm not looking forward >>> to fixing all the lintian issues. Especially writing the many man pages >> >> While I agree that having a manpage for each executable in /usr/bin is a >> nice thing to have sometimes you have to balance what might be more in >> the interest of our users: Waiting for ages until a packages goes out >> equipped with a full set of manpaged or just providing something that >> works in a timely manner. Several times I decided for the later. > > Agreed. Adding the man pages is something left for later. >
[...] > > In this case have the package pass through NEW for the library packages > is my primary concern. > >>> I don't think we should wait much longer to upload the recent changes. >> >> +1 > > I only want to add a pristine-tar branch before the upload to have the > orig.tar.gz from snapshot.d.o recreatable. > >> Kind regards >> >> Andreas. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > Hi, I am back from my work trip, and I can see all the work on pktools! Thanks Bas. I agree that creating all the man pages and renaming the library packages is beyond the original intention of enabling libLAS 1.8.0 to be moved from experimental. The only thing I am not sure has been checked, is whether pktools successfully builds against libLAS 1.8.0. So I will do a test of this. Then I assume we would be ready upload the updated pktools and then merge libLAS from experimental & upload? Cheers, Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
