Hi Bas, On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/07/2014 07:16 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > The libgdal1h C++ symbols files now use an alternative dependency > > template to depend on the upstream version specific virtual package > > provided by libgdal1h. This change was suggested by the Release Team to > > better track dependencies on the unstable C++ ABI. See: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756867#40 > > The alternative dependency is not as helpful as I had hoped. Since we've > not received feedback from the release team, and the transition hasn't > been confirmed, I'm pretty sure it's not going to happen in time for > jessie anymore.
If the release team just has not answered (for whatever reason) I'd rather ping again (is there an according thread on [email protected]?). As far as I understood no *new* transition should be done but I'd consider this as an *ongoing* transition. Please let me know if I somehow can help here Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
