Hello after I update the upstream sources using; gbp import-orig --pristine-tar
how do i create another archive with dfsg suffix ?. Last time, johan or andreas had created this archive but I cannot find how to do it for OTB 5.2.0 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Rashad Kanavath < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello Bas, > > Thanks a lot for fixes in packaging. > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 21-12-15 15:54, Rashad Kanavath wrote: >> > I had add a patch to fix the itk. >> > >> > >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/otb.git/commit/?id=05cd8983a0f4fe0f2b4fae1bc50309fb3c7b9ef1 >> > >> > This way it prevent dragging of all gdcm and other dependencies from ITK >> > when building OTB. >> > >> > I had also updated the symbol files for i386 architecture. Hope it is in >> > good state now. >> >> We can actually build OTB in a clean pbuilder chroot again, so that's >> much better now. Thanks!. >> >> lintian reports quite a number of duplicate-in-relation-field issues for >> libotb-apps & libotb. Sorting the dependencies alphabetically will make >> these easier to spot. You can also use the wrap-and-sort utility from >> devscripts for this. I've committed a fix for this. >> >> lintian also reported a bunch of duplicate short descriptions, like the >> long description, you can make it more descriptive by referencing the >> library in question. I've committed a fix for this too. >> >> The new itk-modules-list.patch is still missing DEP3 patch headers, can >> you add those? >> >> Done. > > >> The Last-Update header in the patches also didn't conform to the DEP3 >> specification which documents the use of the ISO date format >> (YYYY-MM-DD). Please see http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ for more >> information. >> >> There were still a bunch of spelling errors for which I've updated the >> patch. Please forward the patches upstream. >> >> I had added a bug report here: > https://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=1123 > > >> Two of the spelling-error issues are false positives, for which >> commented lintian overrides should be added. As should be done for the >> hardening-no-fortify-functions false positives. >> >> dh_install also reported two more files that aren't explicitly handled: >> >> dh_install --list-missing >> dh_install: usr/share/doc/OTB-5.0/LICENSE exists in debian/tmp but is >> not installed to anywhere >> dh_install: usr/lib/otb/python/otbApplication.pyc exists in debian/tmp >> but is not installed to anywhere >> > > I can do rm for these files. ? > >> >> The amd64 symbols needed an update too, to account for the recent >> toolchain updates. You should always update your sid pbuilder chroots >> before working on package, because new uploads to unstable happen every >> day. And binary packages from the maintainer don't get rebuilt until >> there is a binNMU. >> >> With thatm I think most of the issues are handled now. I'm not sure if >> it's wise to upload it now with the pending new release. Hopefully we >> can drop most of the patches if those get forwarded in time. >> > > No. I will update the packages with new upstream source and update you. > > >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Bas >> >> -- >> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 >> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Rashad > -- Regards, Rashad
