Hi Sebastiaan, thank you for your quick answer. Il 23/12/18 18:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto: > Hi Antonio, > > This is thread is better suited for debian-gis@, I've redirected the OP > there. > > On 12/23/18 6:21 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: >> If you agree, and someone is willing to sponsor uploads, I would like to >> maintain the package and its dependencies under the debian-gis. > > It's already part of the blend tasks, and we have the other projects > too, I don't see why the other related packages shouldn't be maintained > within this team either. > >> Please let me know if you think that satpy is a good candidate for >> debian-gis and if there is someone that want to sponsor it. > > I've sponsored your other packages in this team too, so these won't be > any different. > >> satpy, trollsift, trollimage and python-geotiepoints have been uploaded >> to mentors. I can put them on salsa as soon as someone creates the >> repositories, I do not have permission to do it. > > The repos for the packages have been created: > > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/pygac > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/pyhdf > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/pylibtiff > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/pyspectral > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-geotiepoints > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/pytroll-schedule > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/satpy > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/trollimage > * https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/trollsift > > Please change your local repositories to use these remotes.
thank you very much Just a question: pylibtiff already has a repository on salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pylibtiff). Should I just push all branches to the new one or it is better to move tho old one? >> Regarding pylibtiff, it already has a git repository but probably it >> would be better to move it under debian-gis. >> In any case I will wait for an OK before changing the #705208 into an ITA. > > Is the communication to adopt pylibtiff public somewhere? I don't see > anything on [email protected] in the last three months. > > Following the procedure documented in the devref should suffice: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#adopting You are right, there is no communication yet. I have never done it before. If my understanding of the procedure is correct I should send a mail to Debian QA Group <[email protected]> (that is the current maintainer of the package) and to #705208 declaring my intention to adopt the package. Than I should change the title of #705208 replacing "O" with "ITA" and reassign the #705208 to myself. Is it correct? kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
