It's coming...building and testing today and tomorrow...
C On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Jack Howarth wrote: > After re-reading all the messages in the thread... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/subjects.html#00357 > > I am more convinced that Jakub and Richard are right and no > fixup to the version symboling is required. In particular, if > you look at message... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00374.html > > Franz's objection there is no longer true with HJ's new binutils > fix. This brings me to the following. > It will be ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL that we upgrade binutils to > 2.13.90.0.3 PLUS the patches submitted into the binutils-cvs today > by HJ... > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-08/msg00077.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-08/msg00076.html > > If won't do this on ppc before glibc 2.2.4-14 is built and installed > we will suffer the problem Franz complained about. That is > with the libgcc-compat code for ppc pulled in from glibc-2-2-branch > we end up with the error... > > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > /lib/libc.so.6(.text+0x574): first defined here > > when linking after this new glibc is installed. This is a binutils > bug fixed in the patches cited above. You don't need that > binutils patch to build glibc with the libgcc-compat patch but > you WILL need it to build anything against that glibc after it > is installed. So we should get binutils squared away ASAP so > building on voltaire isn't broken once glibc 2.2.5-14 gets installed. > Jack > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
