At Tue, 20 Aug 2002 09:08:44 -0500, Anthony Towns wrote: > According the update_excuses, there are also the following RC bugs: > > * #153263: libc6-prof: unusable on arm > * #151804: libc6: libbind security hole > * #152099: an empty directory string in LD_LIBRARY_PATH is > interpreted as '.' > * #155606: provide symbols .hidden in gcc 3.1/3.2 when building > glibc for ppc > * #156841: glibc_2.2.5-13(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC code in a > dynamic lib > > Presumably 156841 was fixed in -14; I've heard rumours that 153263 isn't > an issue anymore either. 152099 seems like it's not being treated by > you guys as "grave", so it should probably be downgraded or closed so > the testing scripts know what's going on. 151804 has a remark indicating > it's been fixed, and should be closed. I don't really follow why 155606 > is critical (important, sure, but "breaks unrelated software, the whole > system, causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole" ?). > > Since -13 bumped the shlibs, this has been blocking every package updated > in the last two weeks from entering testing, which isn't healthy.
Ouch. #151804 and #156841 have just be closed because it's fixed. #152099 is downgraded to normal. Thanks Philip. #153263 is kept on woody... Yeah, I missed :-) Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Franz Sirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is discussing at the upstream. If thier patches are included on upstream, then we can only pull from the upstream cvs. But, #155606 can be downgraded to important, as you said. Thanks Philip to work re-tagging it. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
