At Tue, 20 Aug 2002 09:05:14 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I agree with Chritophe here, even after looking at > the relevant bits in other architectures and past > comments by Ulrich. > > A machine context is exactly a signal context. > > That definition of mcontext_t looks extremely out > of date :}
Oh, I don't have a grasp of this... Sorry. > I will test the suggested change and get back to you. Thanks! > Note: Due to some b0rkeness in our 64-bit kernel > the sigcontext returned may not be correct. > We are taking measures to put that fire out :) I expect waiting for your changes :) -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
