At Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:10:35 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:02:04AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:55:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > I still confuse that 'libc6 depends libdb1-compat' does not affect > > > any system breakage. Is apache's recompilation enough for this > > > issue, or not? > > > > Apache's dependancies now appear to be correct even if glibc does > > nothing. > > > > That may not be the case for other apps, dunno. Recompiling and > > fixing depends in those packages does seem like the best idea though. > > I've been going on this: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc-0208/msg00128.html
Is it OK to change for debian/control as follows? Package: libc6 Architecture: arm i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc sparc s390 hppa sh3 sh4 sh3eb sh4eb Section: base Priority: required + Depends: libdb1-compat Package: libc6.1 Architecture: alpha ia64 Section: base Priority: required + Depends: libdb1-compat Package: libc0.3 Architecture: hurd-i386 Section: base Priority: required + Depends: libdb1-compat Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
