Roland,
>
> Both the log entries and the patch here are botched. You must test your
> patches before you send them. Please observe the change log conventions
> more closely. Your entries have inadequate detail and are not in canonical
> form.
How the patch it botched?
1- Patch doesn't apply cleanly.
2- Semantically incorrect.
3- Completely erroneous.
4- Code is not formatted correctly.
...
I admit the following errors in the changelog:
a- Missing ":" after the file name and before the descriptive text.
b- Insuffient detail.
Do you use the term 'canonical' to mean 'simplified' or rather
'conforming to a general rule'?
> > Are there any plans to make this generic?
>
> I think we can move the linux/i386/fcntl.c file to linux. Almost all the
> architectures have both syscalls from what I can see. Architectures where
> there is just one syscall can have linux/ARCH/syscalls.list define fcntl
> and that will override the linux/fcntl.c file.
Excellent.
Thanks for you time Roland.
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
