On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:30:41PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > annexc is an expected failure. Check the output sometime.
> > I have, but I haven't looked at what the test is supposed to do > > yet. =) > > I want to either fix the test or patch it so it doesn't run. > Don't keep it from running. Leave it. It's been there for years and > hurts nothing. There's no reason to get rid of it now. One of my goals is to remove the '-k' from the make check line. I want the build to fail if there are bad tests - that way regressions are caught and dealt with very quickly on arch's that the glibc maintainers aren't using. > Just read the output, you'll see what it is for. Basically it checks > certain headers to see if they define macros that they should and > also don't define macros that they shouldn't. > Do not remove the test. You haven't explained why not. A test that fails and is ignored is useless and misleading. -- learning from failures is nice in theory... but in practice, it sucks :) - Wolfgang Jaehrling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
