I have successfully built X with glibc2.3 and gcc-2.95 on i386. Its running right now but with a small problem. The nvidia driver from X works fine but the binary only one from nvidia doesnt load. It probably needs to be rebuilt with the new glibc so no big deal.
> > From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/10/08 Tue AM 08:51:03 EDT > To: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apt'able repository > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:47:42AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:55:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > > > Basically, as soon as I have .debs from all of the arch's, we're > > > > ready to upload. =) > > > > > Just want to make sure I understand something. Uploading glibc 2.3 > > > does not require switching to gcc-3.2, right? We can still keep the > > > default compiler at gcc-2.95? > > > > Yup - I've tested the following cases with libc6-2.3 on i386: > > > > gcc-2.95 building hello world both static and dynamic > > g++-2.95 building hello world dynamic. > > gcc-3.2 building hello world both static and dynamic > > g++-3.2 building hello wolrd dynamic. > > Could you try something a bit more complex? Maybe test mozilla compiled > with g++-2.95 and X compiled with gcc-2.95? > > -- > Debian - http://www.debian.org/ > Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ > Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ > Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
