On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:00:24PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Heh, restart display managers is outside the scope of libc. Restarting > > services is pushing it enough I think. > > Hmm, I wonder if it would be saner to have some mechanism (perhaps > just a directory fed to run-parts?) for packages to register > themselves for the next time this sort of change happens; having libc > list affected services itself does strike me as a layering violation.
We've been over this before. Problem is, it's almost impossible to tell which ones will need it till they actually fail. We've generally just done the libc6 upgreade and wait for bug reports on services that need to be added to the list. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
