On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:37:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Jeff Bailey wrote: > > It seems that this is caused by pre glibc-2.3 static libraries. I > > don't yet understand the whole problem, but I do know that a simple > > recompile of the static library makes it pick up the new symbols > > correctly. > > Which static library do you mean, one of the ones in glibc, or one in > rpm, or one that rpm might be linked to?
The one in RPM. However, glibc 2.3.1-3 should (temporarily) work around this issue (and a rebuild of static libraries in the RPM package will help, too). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
