[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision, > 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and > 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top > priority, especially when they expect FHS will change in relevant > ways before the port is released.
If top-level directories are allowed to be added by the people that make a distribution then the whole discussion is quite irrelevant. I will ask about this on the FHS lists.. Cheers, -- Alfred M. Szmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
