At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:20:45 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > This patch fixes the bug. uname(&name) changes 'struct name'. But > > evaluation order is not defined (C99 says about in detail), so on i386 > > gcc evaluates '__strverscmp (name.release, "2.1.70") >= 0' in first > > and name.release has no valid value. Thus this function does not work > > well. > > > > Please apply this patch. > > > > Regards, > > -- gotom > > Um, gotom, did you actually _try_ it? This function is not present in > _my_ copy of /usr/lib/libc.a, we get the version in sysdeps/generic/ > instead. Which returns 0. > > And C99 says: > [#1] The following are the sequence points described in > 5.1.2.3: > ... > -- The end of the first operand of the following > operators: logical AND && (6.5.13); logical OR || > (6.5.14); conditional ? (6.5.15); comma , (6.5.17). > > So your patch is unnecessary.
Ah, well you're right. Please just ignore my patch... Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
