> i'm no posix expert, but that looks strange to me. changing that to > 'for file in $@; do' ... works, and seems to be more "standard"..
According to POSIX, specifying no "in" is equivalent to for file in "$@" I do imagine that the explicit specification is more portable though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
