On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 07:19:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > IMO, introducing __libc_fork patch resolve all these issue. > In addition, I strongly object to use such a package-specific conflict. > > From this bug, introducing __libc_fork patch takes us two benefit: > (1) we can safely upgrade from woody to sarge (2) we don't need to > care such conflict. If there is no objection, I commit the patch.
I agree; please do... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
