On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:09, Ben Collins wrote: > > // bits/types.h > > typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
> Unless something drastic changed between 2.3.1-5 and 2.3.1-8, your > headers are broken. I show this: > > typedef __u_quad_t __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */ Yes, my -5 looks the same in another computer. > If in fact your headers are pristine from 2.3.1-8, then it means the > glibc folks decided they weren't going to support compilers that didn't > support long long, and forgot the change sysmacros.h to reflect that. Looks like it. Just checked another computer with -8 and it had the same __DEV_T_TYPE change. > > tcc doesn't do preprocessing separately. > Then if tcc can't show you the preprocessing step, it's broken. Does C require that? Anyway, tcc's point is to be as fast as possible so it does everything at once. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
