At 03 Jan 2003 01:25:14 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > [1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>] > > I don't have IEEE754 and ANSI floating point issue, so I don't know > > whether ANSI defines this behavior or not. If you have IEEE754 or any > > related standards, and if such standards say pow(NaN, 0) have to > > return NaN, reopen this bug. > > C99 draft standard (last freely available version, see > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n2794/n2794.pdf): > > F.9.4.4(1): pow(x, �0) returns 1 for any x, even a NaN. > > So it seems glibc is correct.
Thanks, we really close this bug :) Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
