Your message dated Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:39:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167909: Is this done?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2002 17:48:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 05 11:48:55 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.131]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1897ot-00049H-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:48:55 -0600
Received: from [212.227.126.224] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1897os-0008W6-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 18:48:54 +0100
Received: from [80.138.130.88] (helo=tau)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1897or-0006Yd-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 18:48:53 +0100
From: Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Patch for s390 build problems
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:54:28 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed;
boundary="------------Boundary-00=_S274UUK5MHMU392JTJC6"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <02110518542800.00737@tau>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--------------Boundary-00=_S274UUK5MHMU392JTJC6
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Attached is a patch that solves a lot of FTBS problems of other packages on
s390. It has already been fixed upstream.
--------------Boundary-00=_S274UUK5MHMU392JTJC6
Content-Type: application/x-shellscript;
name="s390-types.dpatch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="s390-types.dpatch"
IyEgL2Jpbi9zaCAtZQogCiMgRFA6IEZpeCBfX3NzaXplX3QgZGVmaW5pdGlvbiBmb3IgczM5MAog
CmlmIFsgJCMgLW5lIDIgXTsgdGhlbgogICAgZWNobyA+JjIgImBiYXNlbmFtZSAkMGA6IHNjcmlw
dCBleHBlY3RzIC1wYXRjaHwtdW5wYXRjaCBhcyBhcmd1bWVudCIKICAgIGV4aXQgMQpmaQpjYXNl
ICIkMSIgaW4KICAgIC1wYXRjaCkgcGF0Y2ggLWQgIiQyIiAtZiAtLW5vLWJhY2t1cC1pZi1taXNt
YXRjaCAtcDAgPCAkMDs7CiAgICAtdW5wYXRjaCkgcGF0Y2ggLWQgIiQyIiAtZiAtLW5vLWJhY2t1
cC1pZi1taXNtYXRjaCAtUiAtcDAgPCAkMDs7CiAgICAqKQogICAgICAgIGVjaG8gPiYyICJgYmFz
ZW5hbWUgJDBgOiBzY3JpcHQgZXhwZWN0cyAtcGF0Y2h8LXVucGF0Y2ggYXMgYXJndW1lbnQiCiAg
ICAgICAgZXhpdCAxCmVzYWMKZXhpdCAwCgotLS0gc3lzZGVwcy91bml4L3N5c3YvbGludXgvczM5
MC9iaXRzL3R5cGVzLmguYmFrCTIwMDItMTEtMDUgMTE6MDA6NDEuMDAwMDAwMDAwICswMTAwCisr
KyBzeXNkZXBzL3VuaXgvc3lzdi9saW51eC9zMzkwL2JpdHMvdHlwZXMuaAkyMDAyLTExLTA1IDEx
OjAzOjE0LjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDEwMApAQCAtNzksNyArNzksMTEgQEAKIHR5cGVkZWYgbG9uZyBp
bnQgIF9fb2ZmX3Q7CQkvKiBUeXBlIG9mIGZpbGUgc2l6ZXMgYW5kIG9mZnNldHMuICAqLwogdHlw
ZWRlZiBfX3F1YWRfdCBfX2xvZmZfdDsJCS8qIFR5cGUgb2YgZmlsZSBzaXplcyBhbmQgb2Zmc2V0
cy4gICovCiB0eXBlZGVmIGludCBfX3BpZF90OwkJCS8qIFR5cGUgb2YgcHJvY2VzcyBpZGVudGlm
aWNhdGlvbnMuICAqLwotdHlwZWRlZiBsb25nIF9fc3NpemVfdDsJCQkvKiBUeXBlIG9mIGEgYnl0
ZSBjb3VudCwgb3IgZXJyb3IuICAqLworI2lmIF9fV09SRFNJWkUgPT0gNjQKK3R5cGVkZWYgbG9u
ZyBpbnQgX19zc2l6ZV90OwkJLyogVHlwZSBvZiBhIGJ5dGUgY291bnQsIG9yIGVycm9yLiAgKi8K
KyNlbHNlCit0eXBlZGVmIGludCBfX3NzaXplX3Q7CQkJLyogVHlwZSBvZiBhIGJ5dGUgY291bnQs
IG9yIGVycm9yLiAgKi8KKyNlbmRpZgogdHlwZWRlZiBfX3VfbG9uZyBfX3JsaW1fdDsJCS8qIFR5
cGUgb2YgcmVzb3VyY2UgY291bnRzLiAgKi8KIHR5cGVkZWYgX191X3F1YWRfdCBfX3JsaW02NF90
OwkJLyogVHlwZSBvZiByZXNvdXJjZSBjb3VudHMgKExGUykuICAqLwogdHlwZWRlZiBfX3VfaW50
IF9faWRfdDsJCQkvKiBHZW5lcmFsIHR5cGUgZm9yIElELiAgKi8K
--------------Boundary-00=_S274UUK5MHMU392JTJC6--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167909-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2003 19:39:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 03 13:39:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from delta.nisa.net [207.194.212.31]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18UXf9-00061V-00; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:39:23 -0600
Received: from delta.nisa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by delta.nisa.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id h03KdLrQ000729
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:39:21 -0800
Received: (from jbailey@localhost)
by delta.nisa.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id h03KdLY0000727;
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:39:21 -0800
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:39:21 -0800
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#167909: Is this done?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <03010320434300.00708@tau>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <03010320434300.00708@tau>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 08:43:43PM +0100, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > Is this bug done? I suspect it is, but it would be nice to get
> > confirmation so it can be properly marked as closed.
> Yes, it's fixed. Thanks.
Excellent! Closing this bug. Thanks for your help and patience.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
