> If that is the so called solution, could somebody please do something > I requested a while ago: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200212/msg00065.html > > tausq: *hint* *hint* > > Regards, > > Joey
Joey, I spoke with you about this, glibc requires that a min_kernel version be defined for each architecture. As per the problems that two users had we added a preinst check so you could not install glibc on a system that had an older kernel than the min_kernel version (e.g. You would never see "FATAL: kernel too old"). http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200212/msg00066.html I intially used 2.4.19 as the defacto min_kernel for all HPPA systems, both 32 & 64-bit. This drew flack from users saying that 2.4.19 wasn't ready to be used in all systems. So I apologized and relaxed the requirement to 2.4.17 for all systems. I'm not opposed to pushing up the kernel to 2.4.19-pa17 for 64-bit systems. c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
