Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:43:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175655: glibc: renders C++ unusable on mipsen
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2003 10:25:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 07 04:25:20 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-83-208-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) 
[24.83.208.253] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18Vqv8-0007jS-00; Tue, 07 Jan 2003 04:25:18 -0600
Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com 
[192.168.0.2])
        by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 7A39F54050; Tue,  7 Jan 2003 02:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 491BE1B9686; Tue,  7 Jan 2003 02:25:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: renders C++ unusable on mipsen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2003 02:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.1-9
Severity: grave

2.3.1-5 works, 2.3.1-8 and -9 do not.  Anything linked to libstdc++ returns:
apt-get: relocation error: /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: symbol sys_nerr, version 
GLIBC_2.3 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

This affects the mips and mipsel architectures.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 175655-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 03:43:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 09 21:43:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.77.96.253] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18Wq4b-0001ED-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 21:43:10 -0600
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 275B554050; Thu,  9 Jan 2003 19:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:43:09 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#175655: glibc: renders C++ unusable on mipsen
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.2 required=5.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
              SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:04:50AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:25:16AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > Package: glibc
> > Version: 2.3.1-9
> > Severity: grave
> >=20
> > 2.3.1-5 works, 2.3.1-8 and -9 do not.  Anything linked to libstdc++ ret=
urns:
> > apt-get: relocation error: /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: symbol sy=
s_nerr, version GLIBC_2.3 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time refe=
rence
> >=20
> > This affects the mips and mipsel architectures.
>=20
> Libstdc++ should be rebuilt.  Yeah, this one wasn't handled well; there
> was some completely incorrect version information for sys_nerr between
> 2.3 and 2.3.1.

This has now been done, fixing the problem...

--=20
Ryan Murray, Debian Developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The opinions expressed here are my own.

--N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+HkFMN2Dbz/1mRasRAvYVAKDLzAL62FQvo3RrDxzl1XIP0B3kKwCeIK76
FeVOJABOC8kVOuVu3yRXVMM=
=sfb2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to