>>>>> On Wed Jan 15, Philip writes:

> This bug has seen no activity in a long time.  Submitter, if you
> still feel that this is an issue (and the problem still exists with
> glibc 2.3.1), can you supply some more details?  Like Ben said
> previously, I'm not aware of any specific requirement that there be
> a 1:1 correspondence between STT_SECTION symbols and actual
> sections.

I'm not terribly in need of it, I just worked around it.  Feel free
to ignore it.

John


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to