At Mon, 3 Feb 2003 02:50:30 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>] > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:31:19AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > > > tags 178217 + patch > > > -- > > > Since this has broken the buildd for hppa, I plan to NMU with the patch > > > below in a few hours. > > Hello? You could at least watch the debian-glibc list before claiming > > you're going to NMU glibc. > > Okay, yellow card to drow. > > No telling people not to NMU, then leaving the bug unfixed for a week. > > Do you guys need more people helping you on glibc, help on different > projects so you can spend more time on glibc, more prodding, more praise, > or what? libc6 has been sitting around with random silly RC bugs for > months, for no good reason. > Both #178217 and #178645 have some sort of patch, why have they not at > least been applied and uploaded to fix the obvious parts of the problems? > > It's much easier for me to say "okay, I can accept these problems, we > really need to move forward" if the problems that we have known fixes > for are fixed. Please help?
OK, OK. I release -11 this night. I experimentally add my cmov fixing patch in this release that has not accepted in upstream yet. This fix also causes loading libraries slower if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set. It may be removed in -12, or I will make another patch to speed up dynamic loading. #178645 (glibc needs to export __umoddi3 et al. on sparc) is another item. There are no activity with sparc32. I plan to look it. #175526 is m68k thing. Rebuilding it needs much time. However it can be removed from glibc BTS. -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
