At Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:10:02 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:42:25AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > [..snip..] > > It's interesting that when Jakub Jelinek sent this patch, > > but Ulrich Drepper added it as GLIBC_2.2 without tests. All > > our patch was as GLIBC_2.0 symbols, but I follow Uli's > > decision. > I think there wasn't a glibc 2.0 for ia64. So this makes sense.
That's right! ...So, should s390 be GLIBC_2.1 or 2.2? > > __clear_cache (libgcc2): > [..snip..] > > Only libgnostep-gui needs it. However, until we really need > > this symbol, it should not be applied. After my build, I > > judge it. > Think that's a good canditate for manual testing. If the upgrade works > everything's fine and there's no need to add the symbol. Maybe we should > cc: the interesting parts of this discussion to the list of the involved > ports. OK, maybe debian-m68k? BTW, now I've commited libgcc-compat-other, and libgcc-compat-all (2003-03-02) for debian-glibc cvs. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
