Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > GOTO Masanori writes: > > > At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100, > > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > > Version: 2.3.1 > > > > Severity: grave > > > > > > > > Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and > > > > one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). > > > > > > Is this diff means as follows? > > > > > > - is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.2 (2003-03-07 crest unstable environment) > > > + is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.3 (2003-03-07 crest testing environment) > > > > yes, the test failures are seen with the 3.2 environment. > > That's not what GOTO said though - could you tell us exactly what tools > are involved in each of those logs?
oops, typo ... - is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.3 (2003-03-07 crest unstable environment) + is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.2 (2003-03-07 crest testing environment) so all the tests pass in testing using glibc-2.2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
