On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 00:43:55 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Thanks for your investigation. The first rule is still difficult to > understand, but the second is clearer than the previous one. If the > draft is approved, then we should change the behavior of them (and I > guess glibc math core library, thus IBM mathmatical library may be > updated).
This is an old draft of the C99 standard, but as I don't have the text of the standard itself and as there are very few differences with the final standard, I (and other people) use it very often. So, you can close the bug now. -- Vincent Lef�vre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Math�matiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
