At Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:48:53 +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:34:09PM -0700, solo turn wrote: > > Subject: libc6: oracle does not install cause of a typo, fixed in 2.3.2 > [..snip..] > > would be very nice, if you could include this fix in the normal libc6 2.3.1. > Wouldn't it be better to get 2.3.2 into unstable? Gotom could you give a > short heads up what needs to be done to get 2.3.2 ready?
I'm sorry not to respond a lot, it's my lazyness. AFAIK, all architectures are ready for shipping out. There is no reason to update into 2.3.2. I retest 2.3.2 on all architecture tonight, and tell you the status (the previous one is lost because of my system failure). Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
