James Troup writes: > GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Matthias, could you tell me that --enable-sjlj-exception is really > > needed for some archs?
arm still uses sjlj based exceptions in 3.3, so there is at least one arch which does not have a choice. > Yes, it's needed. If we don't use it, we break binary compatability > on those architectures and that is simply not an option. (AIUI, FWIW > etc.) these are m68k and hppa. not sure if it's an option or not. at least for binutils glibc-2.3.1 shows failures where I see no ones with 2.2.3, is this fixed for 2.3.2? > > Matthias, and could you tell me gcc-3.3 is really stable for all > > architectures? I heard that BenC claimed gcc-3.3 was broken for > > sparc64... > > Yes, it's broken. Sparc's been downgraded to 3.2 as default until > davem has time to fix 3.3. that should be rechecked with a current 3.3.x btw, would it help to have two different glibc versions, i.e. 2.3.1 for arm, hppa and m68k and the new one for others? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
