Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:49:13 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bug was in the Hurd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2003 14:01:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 04 09:01:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cs.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (ds.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19NYpb-0003gB-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:01:35 -0500
Received: from fmi.uni-sofia.bg (magid.fmi.uni-sofia.bg [62.44.101.57])
by ds.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,
04 Jun 2003 16:59:19 +0300 (E. Europe Daylight Time)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:03:32 +0300
From: Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Device files are not accepted under the Hurd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_DR9pE8nnPSL6LS7BobnIOA)"
X-Accept-Language: bg, en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030527
Debian/1.3.1-2
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-20.6 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,
X_DEBBUGS_CC
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--Boundary_(ID_DR9pE8nnPSL6LS7BobnIOA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch, upstream
Under the Hurd, when device file is passed as an argument to "parted",
Segmentation fault occurs. More detailed report can be found in
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2002-10/msg00036.html
The reason is using store_typed_open instead of store_open. More
information can be found in $HURD/libstore/store.h (or
/include/hurd/store.h). Basicly, store_typed_open expects something
like "device:hd0", while store_open expects something like "/dev/hd0".
Needless to say, the latter is what everyone would try. The first style
is equivalent of (MAJOR,MINOR) pair in *nix, and the second style is
equivalent of block device file name.
I forward this bug report to bug-hurd, as I'm not completly sure if this
is the right fix.
Regards
--
Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Programmer\""
7D9F 66E6 68B7 A62B 0FCF EB04 80BF 3A8C A252 9782
--Boundary_(ID_DR9pE8nnPSL6LS7BobnIOA)
Content-type: text/plain; name=parted.diff
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline; filename=parted.diff
--- parted-1.6.5.orig/libparted/gnu.c
+++ parted-1.6.5/libparted/gnu.c
@@ -235,12 +235,12 @@
arch_specific->consume = 1;
retry_open:
- err = store_typed_open (dev->path, 0, NULL, &arch_specific->store);
+ err = store_open (dev->path, 0, NULL, &arch_specific->store);
if (err) {
error_t rw_err = err;
- err = store_typed_open (dev->path, STORE_READONLY, NULL,
- &arch_specific->store);
+ err = store_open (dev->path, STORE_READONLY, NULL,
+ &arch_specific->store);
if (err) {
if (ped_exception_throw (
PED_EXCEPTION_ERROR,
--Boundary_(ID_DR9pE8nnPSL6LS7BobnIOA)--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 196085-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2003 12:46:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 11 07:46:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.uni-sofia.bg (su.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.96.1]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19mC48-0000Kj-00; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:46:25 -0500
Received: (qmail 25984 invoked by uid 503); 11 Aug 2003 12:42:50 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by su.uni-sofia.bg by uid 500 with qmail-scanner-1.12
(F-PROT: 3.11. Clear:. Processed in 0.361534 secs); 11 Aug 2003 12:42:50 -0000
Received: from magid.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (HELO fmi.uni-sofia.bg) (62.44.101.57)
by ns.uni-sofia.bg with SMTP; 11 Aug 2003 12:42:49 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:49:13 +0300
From: Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030714 Debian/1.4-2
X-Accept-Language: bg, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The bug was in the Hurd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
I'm closing this bug because the bug was in the Hurd itself. The
relevant commit is
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/commit-hurd/2003-08/msg00007.html
Regards
--
Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED],fsa-bg.org}>
7D9F 66E6 68B7 A62B 0FCF EB04 80BF 3A8C A252 9782
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
