Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:39:56 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204656: libc-udeb: double udeb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 02:12:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 08 21:12:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.249]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lJDv-0007u9-00; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 21:12:52 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19lJDv-00031b-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 04:12:51 +0200
Received: from [80.146.47.139] (helo=frodo)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19lJDu-0000kz-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 04:12:50 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5CE2D62454; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 04:12:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 04:12:44 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc-udeb: double udeb
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GPJrCs/72TxItFYR"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.20
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libc-udeb
Version: 2.3.2-2 (not installed)
Severity: minor
Description:
glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation
libc-udeb - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data - udeb (ud=
eb)
=20
I think one udeb is enough and the " - udeb" could be stripped off. :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/NFic+FmQsCSK63MRAphtAJsEglnqz6eumibfZYWXK4OzlmuDMACdFeQQ
v9qW4yZNv2hFAJ8RN76spfw=
=ZdVA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204656-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2003 04:39:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 17 23:39:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19oboD-0001Sr-00; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 23:39:57 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2B741C33C7; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:39:56 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:39:56 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#204656: libc-udeb: double udeb
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
At Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:20:52 +0200,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sat, 9 Aug 2003 04:12:44 +0200,
> > Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Package: libc-udeb
> > > Version: 2.3.2-2 (not installed)
> > > Severity: minor
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation
> > > libc-udeb - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data - udeb (udeb)
> > >
> > > I think one udeb is enough and the " - udeb" could be stripped off. :)
> >
> > No, this (udeb) is added by other tools (how to print above
>
> Hmm.
>
> > Description message?). We need to distinct with libc6 Description
>
> I got that from the .changes file of the last libc upload (I copied
> it from debian-devel-changes)
Ah, so I guess the .deb handling software (something nice girl name? :-)
added (udeb) part. It's no problem, so I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
