On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:45, GOTO Masanori wrote: > I wonder it's really safe. If we create a lot of threads like Java > EJB environment, we consume virtual memory four times faster than the > current implementation. You find STACK_SIZE is a boundary for each > thread. The right way is to support floating stack (thus libc6-686) > or nptl + tls, I think. I'm afraid this patch affects badly.
Ah. Does Java really create that many threads? If it does, then you're right: we will have to back out this patch, and applications that need abnormally large thread stacks must allocate them by hand. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
