Hi Anousak,
At Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:29:22 -0400,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about this.. I did submit the revision/fix to Mr. Drepper, but it seems did
> not get through. I will re-send him once more. However, I attached the file here.
> Please include this to Debian distro.
Thanks for your quick reply!
I, however, think your update is already accepted:
2003-07-02 Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* locales/lo_LA: Update collation info for U0EAF and U0EC6.
Update era_t_fmt, era_d_t_fmt, country_name, and lang_name fields.
Patch by Anousak Souphavanh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
I guess your patch modification breaks something. Did you test your
data with the latest glibc cvs?
Thanks in advance,
-- gotom
> Thanks,
>
> Anousak Souphavanh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GOTO Masanori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 1:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Forward: Bug#205118: locales: lo_LA.UTF-8 is broken
>
> Dear Anousak,
>
> I'm one of debian project glibc packager, and recently I got a below
> bug report for the latest glibc cvs. This bug report complaints that
> localedef show error when we generate lo_LA.UTF-8 locale. I found you
> sent a patch for U00000EC6 2 months ago. Do you know something about
> this problem?
>
> Best regards,
> -- gotom
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.3.2-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi, locale-gen stops with:
> lo_LA.UTF-8.../usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:321: order for `U00000EC6'
> already defined at /usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:286
> /usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:610: order for `U00000EAF' already
> defined at /usr/share/i18n/locales/lo_LA:285
>
> One might try to fix this bug, but a simpler solution is to remove lo_LA.UTF-8 from
> /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED until it is really supported.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
