Your message dated Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:54:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210608: glibc: breaks OpenOffice.org...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2003 12:51:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 12 07:51:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.251]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xnOi-000410-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:51:36 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19xnOh-0002aZ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:51:35 +0200
Received: from [80.146.39.178] (helo=frodo)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19xnOg-0004Xg-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:51:34 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D7284623F9; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:50:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:50:39 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: breaks OpenOffice.org build
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cYtjc4pxslFTELvY"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.28
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--cYtjc4pxslFTELvY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.2-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
during compiling OpenOffice.org (and icu):
ccache gcc -D_REENTRANT -I../../common -I../../common -I../../i18n
-I./../toolut
il -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUCONVMSG_LINK=3Duconvmsg -O -c -o uwmsg.o
uwmsg.c
/bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs uconvmsg/resources
mkdir uconvmsg
mkdir uconvmsg/resources
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../../common:../../i18n:../../tools/toolutil:../../layout=
:../../
extra/ustdio:../../tools/ctestfw:../../data/out:../../data:../../stubdata/:=
$LD_L
IBRARY_PATH ../../tools/genrb/genrb -p uconvmsg -e UTF-8 -s resources
-d uconvms
g/resources root.txt
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-minimal.c: 137: realloc: Assertion
`new =3D=3D p
tr' failed!
make[3]: *** [uconvmsg/resources/uconvmsg_root.res] Fehler 127
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/
openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/extra/u=
conv'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/
openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/icu/source/extra'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org/Hauptpakete/
openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu/unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/icu/source'
dmake: Error code 2, while making
'./unxlngi4.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_icu'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org
/Hauptpakete/openoffice.org-1.0.99+1.1rc3/icu
This IRC snippet _may_ be helpful; I doubt it, though...
00:05 < asuffield> oh, I see what that code does. I'd bet on a glibc bug
00:05 < asuffield> the function has a screwey precondition and fails like t=
hat
if it doesn't hold
00:05 < Overfiend> doogie: do diversions of conffiles work?
00:06 < Overfiend> doogie: i.e., does dpkg not prompt you about updating
diverted conffiles?
00:06 < jbailey> asuffield: Do you have time to work up a bug report /
test
case? If not, can you send me what you're looking at
so I can research more?
00:06 < Overfiend> (the manpage doesn't mention this case)
00:07 < asuffield> jbailey: I'm just eyeballing dl-minimal.c. realloc() has=
to
be called with exactly the right argument; it's a 9-line
function
00:07 < asuffield> there are several calls to realloc in elf/, figures. I d=
on't
feel like chasing it
Unfortunately this at least seems to be an heisenbug on my machine --
if I execute this line manually it works; it doesn't work in the build
though
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.21-rene #3 Mit Aug 6 17:21:44 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--cYtjc4pxslFTELvY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/YcEf+FmQsCSK63MRAip7AJ9adykcnakNRypxGbuEBrz4ym71tACfZEgB
m1+rsy4AvSUoILy452eJq5k=
=MVnV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cYtjc4pxslFTELvY--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 210608-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2003 19:56:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 02 14:56:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from stan.ping.de [62.72.95.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A59Yx-0001G4-00; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:56:35 -0500
Received: from rene by stan.ping.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1A59Yt-0004ip-00; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 21:56:31 +0200
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:54:13 +0200
X-OfflineIMAP-x224573-52656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1065124515-0547832456631
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#210608: glibc: breaks OpenOffice.org...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi aj,
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On 12th September, drow wrote:
> > We'd really need a backtrace for this...
>=20
> You have -3 weeks to comply.
>=20
> (Come on guys, this isn't good enough.)
The problem is that I got this error in my builds. I executed the
line from the build "out of the build" and it worked. And the error didn't
create a coredump...
However, this error myteriously does not appear anymore (-7 here)
so I am closing this bug...
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/fIJl+FmQsCSK63MRArdBAJ4jRB1vZnhIKILwyHr1GKFHbYl6OACcD/Mi
NkFRWpHsSz1nUDjptq7IsbQ=
=RWQ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
