On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:30:18PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I don't mind providing libc6-dev for libc0.3-deb. I think the right > solution is to drop the provides completely. The former we can do now, > the latter we cannot consider until after Sarge releases.
Fully agreed (all 4 statements). Could you do the former now? > Do you mind holding off until December for this? Of course not. I knew that before submitting the bug. If you're going to add the provides to libc0.3-dev, don't forget adding them to libc1-dev. Btw, maybe this bug should be reassigned to libc0.3-dev? -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
