On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 05:29:57PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > First of all, just double-checking - this affects mips but not mipsel, > correct? And you can't tell the difference between them by uname, > IIRC. The glibc patch is needed for both mips and mipsel to make msqs work again. mips needed an additional kernel update.
> Secondly, is a warning (rather than an error) acceptable, or do you > want an error? I think a warning is sufficient. > Let me know and I'll take care of it (in the packages in experimental - > almost done now). Thanks a lot. -- Guido
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
