Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:53:22 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204643: glibc: Could you add NPTL?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2003 23:04:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 08 18:04:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lGHi-0003Nj-00; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 18:04:34 -0500
Received: (qmail 11265 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 23:04:33 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 23:04:33 -0000
Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19lGHF-0005xZ-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:04:05 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: Could you add NPTL?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:04:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Could you add NPTL? Now that kernel 2.6 is coming nearer it would be
nice to have it available.
TIA
Adrian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204643-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2003 00:54:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 27 18:53:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.77]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AEI6u-0003DW-00; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:53:24 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.77])
by oris.opensource.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 69414C33C1; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:53:22 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:53:22 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#204643: glibc: Could you add NPTL?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:14:25 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:04:05 +0200,
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: glibc
> > Version: 2.3.2-2
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Could you add NPTL? Now that kernel 2.6 is coming nearer it would be
> > nice to have it available.
>
> Yes, we plan to do.
In recent nptl aware glibc is existed in experimental.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
