Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > To sum up the previous discussion, the ia64 linux ABI apparently > > offers no opportunity for ld.so to ensure that function descriptors > > remain constant, even over successive executions of the same binary on > > the same machine. > > There is no problem with statically initialized function pointers, only > for assigned pointer at runtime. The function descriptors for the former > are generated at compile time and won't ever change. > OK, but I need saved runtime-initialized function pointers. Do you have either a reference for how xemacs has handled this, or a contact person who might know? Was there ever a GNU emacs obstacle on ia64 linux, or am I confusing the situation with xemacs? Take care, > > I believe that this issue stood in the way of an emacs port to ia64 > > linux for some time, > > There is no such problem with GNU Emacs. Only XEmacs has this problem. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N�rnberg > Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now for something completely different." > > > _______________________________________________ > Gcl-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
