Your message dated Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2003 21:53:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 24 16:53:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post3.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.77]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19fo1N-0004PC-00; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:53:09 -0500
Received: from conversion.post3.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.2 #30756)
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
24 Jul 2003 14:38:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107])
by asu.edu (PMDF V6.2 #30756) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:38:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from east.mars.asu.edu (east.la.asu.edu [129.219.48.26])
by smtp.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped)
with ESMTP id h6OLcmQ18137; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:38:48 -0700 (MST)
Received: from osiris.mars.asu.edu (osiris.mars.asu.edu [149.169.146.44])
by east.mars.asu.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6OLckc08019; Thu,
24 Jul 2003 14:38:50 -0700 (MST)
Received: from jim by osiris.mars.asu.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19fnnS-00087s-00; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:38:46 -0700
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:38:46 -0700
From: Jim Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nfs-kernel-server: rpc.mountd dying with no diagnostics after 1.0.3-2
upgrade
Sender: Jim Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,PENISACCENT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading nfs-kernel-server from 1.0.3-1 to 1.0.3-2 (14 Jul 2003 release),
rpc.mountd
has been dying 'randomly' with no diagnostics in any logs or to the console. After an
arbitrary (?) number of successful mount/unmount requests from clients, the rpc.mountd
process disappears. It is happening to me consistently, but I am unsure what the
specific
trigger is, as it happens on different client hosts at different times.
I downgraded back to 1.0.3-1 and everything is working fine again.
I didn't see any way to get rpc.mountd to report debugging information.
I'd be happy to help diagnose and resolve this problem and may do so on my own,
however feel
free to contact me if you need more information about my system.
Thanks,
Jim Stewart
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux osiris 2.4.21-pre5-ac3 #2 SMP Thu Mar 13 03:03:23 MST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on:
ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libwrap0 7.6-ipv6.1-3 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii nfs-common 1:1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client
ii sysvinit 2.84-2woody1 System-V like init.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 209139-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 14:44:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 03 08:44:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from marge.v3.ca [216.66.20.89]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGfws-0006Z6-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:44:55 -0600
Received: from marge.v3.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by marge.v3.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-0) with ESMTP id hA3EiegS001485;
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:40 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by marge.v3.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-0) id hA3Eidru001484;
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:39 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: marge.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:39 -0800
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not an NMU
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-EMSscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EMSscan-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-9.009,
required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_AGENT_MUTT -4.11)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
2.3.2-6 wasn't an NMU, Philip just had the wrong email address in the
changelog. Closing for real.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
