Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:20:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#92520: Testcase?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2001 06:04:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 02 01:04:13 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net [206.65.64.31] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jxRl-0005tB-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 01:04:13 -0500
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA09868
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:04:13 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:04:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SystemV/CST6CDT timezone acts like CST6 (no DST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.2-1
The SystemV timezone files included with this libc6 package do not correctly
handle DST. Using SystemV/CST6CDT as my timezone, 'date' still lists time in
terms of CST even though CDT has been in effect now for close to 24hrs. I've
confirmed that all of the SystemV timezones suffer from the same problem;
/usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/CST6CDT and /usr/share/zoneinfo/CST6CDT do not,
however. This suggests the possible workaround of cloning the posix entries
to the SystemV directory, but I profess ignorance of the actual
structure/contents of these files, so I have no idea if this is practical.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 92520-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2003 22:17:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 21 16:17:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AY7G2-0005w4-00; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 11:20:46 -0600
Received: from hosts ([65.49.88.87])
by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:20:24 -0500
Subject: Re: Bug#92520: Testcase?
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="=-8oRg2wwoWsTdMZAkEgyh"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:20:44 -0500
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at
fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:20:24 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
--=-8oRg2wwoWsTdMZAkEgyh
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 12:12, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Testing here also shows that SystemV/CST6CDT now works like
> posix/CST6CDT et al., so I think this bug can be safely closed.
Done and done!
Thank-you for calling, have a nice day.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--=20
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe.
- Bruce Schneier
--=-8oRg2wwoWsTdMZAkEgyh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA/5dZs5M5hmdCYCpkRArn5AKDazcPNlh50A/wC4Wz1yJ0vy/uyeQCdG8Il
JgiEjTz5tBwWO4xrTShDCaQ=
=oct7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-8oRg2wwoWsTdMZAkEgyh--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
