On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 12:27:43PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > Almost all of the patch would simply be adding files, and then you might > have a trivial change to the include path if you're unlucky. This > wouldn't be hard at all. Plus, you can probably get the maintainer to > include the same patch in later versions.
I feel we're at cross-purposes here. What I would like to have is the possibility to build a linux-kernel-headers package that _doesn't_ install 2.6 headers to /usr/include, leaving the 2.4 kernel headers intact. A package needing 2.6 headers could depend on my local linux-kernel-headers package and carry -I/usr/include/linux-kernel-headers in its Makefile. I don't see where this setup would break the local libc. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Karlsruhe, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
