On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:40:53AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:44:00 -0500, > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:07:18AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:39:33AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > However, bits/syscall.h should be provided by glibc - it should be > > > > generated from arch/mips/unistd.h. In kernel 2.6 mips guys introduces > > > > > > Yes, it should. drow has fixed it in his tree, and this fix should be in > > > the next upload. > > > > No, I've fixed it in my (MontaVista) tree and sent the patch to > > debian-glibc. Someone should figure out if it works on Debian's > > version of glibc and kernel headers also, which is quite different from > > the ones we're using at MV. > > Where can I find your patch? The current syscall.h is broken, so I > think you're ok to put such patch into debian-glibc cvs, and we watch > the result of buildd if no one is trying to look it.
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/10962 http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2004/debian-glibc-200401/msg00115.html I'd be really grateful if you'd take care of that. The other thing I know needs to be done is to either add an environment variable to enable the ld.so warning, or just disable it entirely - Jeff, if you aren't going to have time for the former then let me know so I can do the latter. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
