Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:40:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222709: */time.h: Some one is not using _STRUCT_TIMEVAL.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2003 13:30:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 02 07:28:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-24-245-10-50.mn.client2.attbi.com (overrun.is-a-geek.org)
[24.245.10.50]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ARAa3-0002Rg-00; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:28:43 -0600
Received: from cheako by overrun.is-a-geek.org with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1ARAcJ-0001nn-Ri; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:31:03 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: */time.h: Some one is not using _STRUCT_TIMEVAL.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:31:03 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "Reply-To" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
This is what I get from...
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
In file included from /usr/include/sys/time.h:28,
from tmp.c:2:
/usr/include/bits/time.h:70: error: redefinition of struct timeval'
In file included from /usr/include/sys/select.h:44,
from /usr/include/sys/time.h:30,
from tmp.c:2:
/usr/include/time.h:119:
error: redefinition of struct timespec'
In file included from /usr/include/sys/time.h:30,
from tmp.c:2:
/usr/include/sys/select.h:78: error: conflicting types for fd_set'
/usr/include/linux/types.h:22: error: previous declaration
of fd_set'
In file included from tmp.c:2:
/usr/include/sys/time.h:57: error: redefinition of struct timezone'
/usr/include/sys/time.h:94: error: parse error before numeric constant
/usr/include/sys/time.h:108: error: redefinition of struct itimerval'
This is scary, how did this get distributed?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux overrun 2.6.0-test9-1-386 #1 Sun Oct 26 22:32:52 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-9 Linux Kernel Headers for developme
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 222709-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2004 19:40:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 16 13:40:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AhZpI-0000bT-00; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:40:16 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian))
id 1AhZpH-0003aY-ER; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:40:15 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:40:15 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#222709: */time.h: Some one is not using _STRUCT_TIMEVAL.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:31:03AM -0600, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
> ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-9 Linux Kernel Headers for developme
Try a newer version. This is fixed.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]