Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:37 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line -11 solves this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2003 20:59:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 04 14:53:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cs2416783-242.houston.rr.com (crustytoothpaste.ath.cx) [24.167.83.242]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AH8Av-0000rP-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:53:17 -0600
Received: from stonewall (unknown [192.168.2.2])
by crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (Postfix) with SMTP
id CD4E07BC28; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by stonewall (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:53:15 +0000
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:53:15 +0000
From: "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-sparc64: unexpected reloc type 0x08
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9
Severity: important
After compiling the attached code with "gcc -o long-double-len ldl.c"
and executing "./long-double-len", the code fails with the following
error:
./long-double-len: error while loading shared libraries: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected
reloc type 0x08
I have tried rebooting and reinstalling the package. Neither helped. I
also tried using the 2.4.18 sun4u kernel; this was also unsuccessful (it
gave me the error message "cannot execute binary file").
8b6588c19a0e1b20affb9703f3d4ce19 *ldl.c
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux ryan-graves 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages libc6-sparc64 depends on:
ii lib64gcc1 1:3.3.2-1 GCC support library (64bit)
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ubi libertas, ibi patria.
iQEVAwUBP6gRu+WR/8lWBVPnAQO2+Af/RKiKpk3L3I5J3dD0lojIXT//2PiUfMqM
Gey4mmFTKnkP7nfGJqJEjtnIkVYAy1Kqz6tcY65x8/1pIh6GwDN6vGRK88sJjkVi
AVZMOu1ttR72QU+Yct7mfWI9yAAtCwMZibHpXrVqwq1TJKd2JSz0FzSoKTkJIxLC
bUlzoS47PcrGify/HimqwKe6DNHOiLkqyxR3rpjOuKzMmARVZDmOODgA8cpjTVh3
X8uGnwej8AvvfX2qXb0eDGUSaGIZQ+sbD/t4ntNg3EElgSIJg096YfKbokn3hxa+
v4ZWm+Tf7RSprhWVuK6qBAkFAl6Ouf9pab+uuABosMy/L3ivwEtXug==
=9DK4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219180-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2004 01:31:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 17:31:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from marge.v3.ca [216.66.20.89]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkvbK-0001kh-00; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:42 -0800
Received: from marge.v3.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by marge.v3.ca (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.11.Beta0/Debian-1) with ESMTP id
i0Q1VcJT024336;
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:38 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by marge.v3.ca (8.12.11.Beta0/8.12.10/Debian-0) id i0Q1VbFd024335;
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:37 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: marge.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:37 -0800
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: -11 solves this bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-EMSscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EMSscan-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-9.009,
required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_AGENT_MUTT -4.11)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level:
-11 fixes sparc64 binaries. I hadn't closed them in the ChangeLog
because I wanted to double check and make sure after it had been
built by the autobuilder.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
