At Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:16:23 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:57:14AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > severity 230765 normal > > thanks > > > > At Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:30:56 +0100, > > Jacek Sliwerski wrote: > > > Justification: info documentation is unusable > > > > > > This is what I see after opening info: > > > > > > GNU libraries > > > * ALTWERASE: (libc)Local Modes. > > > * ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN: (libc)Argp Parser Functions. > > > * ARG_MAX: (libc)General Limits. > > > * BC_BASE_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits. > > > * BC_DIM_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits. > > > * BC_SCALE_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits. > > > * BC_STRING_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits. > > > * BRKINT: (libc)Input Modes. > > > * BUFSIZ: (libc)Controlling Buffering. > > > * CCTS_OFLOW: (libc)Control Modes. > > > > > > There are more than 1700 entries. Browsing is impossible. > > > > Please explain what the problem is, and how to reproduce your problem. > > BTW, even if you have difficulties to browse entries, it's no glibc > > bug. > > We used to (because of a bug in the rules file, AFAIK) not include > dir-add.info in the Texinfo index. > > Since I fixed it two people have complained that they don't link having > the index in the top texinfo menu. Want to see it? Just type 'info' > and page down a bit. > > After thinking about it, I suppose they're probably right. We should > find something else to do with dir-add.info than add it to this list.
Oops. Daniel, thanks, good point. I everytime type "info libc", not just "info". Hmm, well, "impossible" is overstatement, but it seems almost impossible. Daniel, do you have plan to fix it? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
